Jetpack Compose UI
Compose-first for new screens, Material 3 design system, Compose-Compiler stability metrics in CI, animation performance budgets.
Senior engineering · Android / Kotlin
Native Android engineering — Kotlin, Jetpack Compose, Coroutines, Hilt, and the long-tail device discipline (Pixel 4a → Galaxy S25, Android 10+) most apps under-test for.
Why senior, not contractor
Most Android apps are tested on the engineer's flagship and shipped to a long-tail device fleet that breaks in unexpected ways. Prosigns ships Android with Compose-first UI, Coroutines + Flow for the async layer, performance budgets defended on real low-end devices (Pixel 4a, Galaxy A-series), and the Play Store review discipline that catches Data Safety mismatches before the listing rejection.
Senior floor
G6+ minimum
Bench depth
15+ G6/G9 engineers
In production
2018+
Engagement
Outcome-led SOW
Where Android / Kotlin ships
Specific applications of Android / Kotlin we’ve built and operate. Every example below maps to a real engagement, not a bullet on a stack-card.
Compose-first for new screens, Material 3 design system, Compose-Compiler stability metrics in CI, animation performance budgets.
Structured concurrency, StateFlow / SharedFlow for UI state, Channel for events. No more LiveData except for migration.
Data Safety section reviewed against runtime, common rejection categories audited pre-submission, staged rollout discipline.
Managed Google Play, Android Enterprise / Work Profile, MDM (Intune, Workspace ONE), Android Management API.
Compose for iOS / desktop / web where the cross-platform investment is genuinely warranted; not a default but a tool when it fits.
Wear OS apps with proper complications, Android Auto for media / messaging, Android TV for media-led brands.
Stack depth
Frameworks, libraries, and runtime tools the bench has shipped in production. Not a CV-skim — a working depth.
UI
Async + concurrency
Architecture + DI
Data + persistence
Quality + ops
Engagement models
We don’t bill hourly contractors. Engagements run against outcomes — choose the shape that matches the work.
See engagement modelsFixed-scope
When the deliverable is clear and the scope is bounded — an MVP, a migration, a discrete platform build. Senior engineering against a written outcome, not against a body count.
Embedded squad
When the work is product-shaped and the cadence is continuous. A senior pod (engineering + design + PM as needed) embedded into your team, with the practice lead co-piloting from HELM.
Managed services
When the system is running and needs ongoing engineering ownership — operations, SLO defense, release management, security and compliance evidence. Monthly retainer against a published SLA.
Selected work
Healthcare
Compose-first with Coroutines + Flow. Offline-first sync via Room + WorkManager. Performance budgets enforced on real low-end devices in CI before merge.
Duration · 8 months
Brief us
Reply < 4 business hoursFive fields. Goes straight to the practice lead — not an SDR. We’ll reply with a senior engineer’s read on fit, scope, and the engagement model that suits the work.
FAQ
Everything below also appears in the proposal and the SOW — no surprises after signing.
Compose for new builds. XML interop only where necessary — large legacy fragments, third-party SDKs that haven't shipped Compose support. We don't ship XML-only new builds in 2026.
Kotlin. Java is fine for legacy maintenance but shouldn't be the choice for new modules. KSP for annotation processing where KAPT is too slow.
Engineering-led delivery. We don't bill hourly contractors against your JIRA board. Every engagement runs against a defined outcome with a senior engineer accountable from kickoff to operating cutover. If you genuinely need staff-aug — discrete bodies, your management, hourly rates — we'll be honest and route you to a partner that fits.
G6 minimum (six-plus years in their craft) on every billable hour. Department leads are G9 or G10. We don't flex juniors onto the bench mid-sprint, we don't subcontract to delivery centers, and we don't dilute senior rates with mixed staffing. The bench in the proposal is the bench in production.
Three engagement models published at /engagement-models/. Fixed-scope for defined deliverables, embedded squads for ongoing product work, managed services for steady-state operations. Rates depend on seniority, engagement length, and region. Discovery + scoping conversation is free; SOWs are written against deliverables, not bodies.
Senior-only across Dallas, Doha, Lahore, and Islamabad. We staff against the engagement's needs (timezone, language, regulatory frame), not against arbitrary regional preferences. Most engagements run with a US/EU-aligned core and a follow-the-sun extended bench when the workload warrants it.
Yes. We name the engineers in the SOW, attach their profiles, and they're on the kickoff. We don't bait-and-switch with senior reviewers and junior execution. If a named engineer needs to roll off the engagement (rare), we surface a replacement from the same seniority tier with explicit handoff.
Talk to a Android / Kotlin lead
Bring the workload — we’ll bring a senior engineer plus the practice lead most relevant to the work. 30 minutes, no obligation, no junior reps.