Nuxt 3 applications
Nitro server, hybrid rendering (SSR / ISR / SPA), built-in API routes, server components (experimental), Image / Fonts / SEO modules.
Senior engineering · Vue.js
Vue 3 + Nuxt 3 for production frontends — Composition API, Pinia, server-rendered Nuxt, and the design-system discipline Vue rewards but most teams still under-invest in.
Why senior, not contractor
Vue 3 with Composition API + Pinia + Nuxt 3 is a serious production frontend stack — TypeScript-first, ergonomic, and increasingly the choice for teams who want React's capabilities without React's component-model debates. Prosigns ships Vue for greenfield product builds, for replatforms off legacy Vue 2 (Options API + Vuex), and for design-system-heavy apps where Vue's template ergonomics are the value.
Senior floor
G6+ minimum
Bench depth
18+ G6/G9 engineers
In production
2019+
Engagement
Outcome-led SOW
Where Vue.js ships
Specific applications of Vue.js we’ve built and operate. Every example below maps to a real engagement, not a bullet on a stack-card.
Nitro server, hybrid rendering (SSR / ISR / SPA), built-in API routes, server components (experimental), Image / Fonts / SEO modules.
Script setup, reactive primitives (ref / reactive / computed), Pinia for state, VueUse for composables. TypeScript-strict throughout.
Headless UI Vue, Radix Vue, Element Plus, Naive UI. Tokenized themes, accessibility primitives, Storybook regression suite.
Core Web Vitals defended in CI, route-level code splitting, image optimization, font subsetting, hydration-strategy tuning.
Phased Options API → Composition API, Vuex → Pinia, vue-cli → Vite, Vue 2 EOL legacy → modern Nuxt 3 with reconciled cutover.
Type-safe data fetching with @tanstack/vue-query or Nuxt's useFetch. tRPC + Vue, GraphQL with Apollo Vue, OpenAPI codegen.
Stack depth
Frameworks, libraries, and runtime tools the bench has shipped in production. Not a CV-skim — a working depth.
Frameworks
State + data
UI
Forms + validation
Quality + ops
Engagement models
We don’t bill hourly contractors. Engagements run against outcomes — choose the shape that matches the work.
See engagement modelsFixed-scope
When the deliverable is clear and the scope is bounded — an MVP, a migration, a discrete platform build. Senior engineering against a written outcome, not against a body count.
Embedded squad
When the work is product-shaped and the cadence is continuous. A senior pod (engineering + design + PM as needed) embedded into your team, with the practice lead co-piloting from HELM.
Managed services
When the system is running and needs ongoing engineering ownership — operations, SLO defense, release management, security and compliance evidence. Monthly retainer against a published SLA.
Selected work
Retail
Migrated a Vue 2 + Vuex storefront to Nuxt 3 + Pinia with hybrid SSR/ISR rendering. Headless backend on the existing API. Phased migration over 4 months with zero customer-visible regressions.
Duration · 4 months
Brief us
Reply < 4 business hoursFive fields. Goes straight to the practice lead — not an SDR. We’ll reply with a senior engineer’s read on fit, scope, and the engagement model that suits the work.
FAQ
Everything below also appears in the proposal and the SOW — no surprises after signing.
Both are credible. Vue when the team prefers template-led ergonomics, when the design-system discipline benefits from Vue's scoped styles, or when the existing organizational Vue investment is significant. React when the team is React-first or when the broader React ecosystem (especially RSC + Server Actions) is the value. We’ll tell you which fits your team and workload.
Nuxt 3 for SSR-needed apps and projects where the batteries-included story (file-based routing, SEO, image, fonts modules) pays for itself. Vite + Vue Router for embedded admin tools and SPAs where Nuxt's full-stack opinions get in the way. We ship both.
Engineering-led delivery. We don't bill hourly contractors against your JIRA board. Every engagement runs against a defined outcome with a senior engineer accountable from kickoff to operating cutover. If you genuinely need staff-aug — discrete bodies, your management, hourly rates — we'll be honest and route you to a partner that fits.
G6 minimum (six-plus years in their craft) on every billable hour. Department leads are G9 or G10. We don't flex juniors onto the bench mid-sprint, we don't subcontract to delivery centers, and we don't dilute senior rates with mixed staffing. The bench in the proposal is the bench in production.
Three engagement models published at /engagement-models/. Fixed-scope for defined deliverables, embedded squads for ongoing product work, managed services for steady-state operations. Rates depend on seniority, engagement length, and region. Discovery + scoping conversation is free; SOWs are written against deliverables, not bodies.
Senior-only across Dallas, Doha, Lahore, and Islamabad. We staff against the engagement's needs (timezone, language, regulatory frame), not against arbitrary regional preferences. Most engagements run with a US/EU-aligned core and a follow-the-sun extended bench when the workload warrants it.
Yes. We name the engineers in the SOW, attach their profiles, and they're on the kickoff. We don't bait-and-switch with senior reviewers and junior execution. If a named engineer needs to roll off the engagement (rare), we surface a replacement from the same seniority tier with explicit handoff.
Talk to a Vue.js lead
Bring the workload — we’ll bring a senior engineer plus the practice lead most relevant to the work. 30 minutes, no obligation, no junior reps.