AWS Organizations + Control Tower
Multi-account architecture, SCP boundaries, account vending, Identity Center (SSO), Service Catalog for managed templates.
Loading…
Hire AWS engineers · Texas
AWS architecture and engineering: multi-account, multi-region, IaC-driven, FinOps-aware, and the operating discipline that defends an SLO instead of just tracking spend.
Hiring AWS engineers in Texas
Texas engagements ship with the same seniorAWS bench used across every Prosigns delivery. No staff-augmentation, no junior fallback, no SDR routing. The engineers in the proposal are the engineers in production.
Why senior, not contractor
Most AWS environments accreted over years: root accounts in production, IAM policies pasted from Stack Overflow, regional sprawl, and a bill that grows 30% YoY without any team able to explain why. Prosigns ships AWS as a managed practice: multi-account organizations with clean SCP boundaries, Terraform / CDK-driven infrastructure, observability calibrated to the on-call's actual questions, and FinOps that trims 30–40% of cloud spend in the first quarter.
Senior floor
G6+ minimum
Bench depth
25+ G6/G9 engineers
In production
2018+
Engagement
Outcome-led SOW
Where AWS ships
Specific applications of AWSwe’ve built and operate. Every example below maps to a real engagement, not a bullet on a stack-card.
Multi-account architecture, SCP boundaries, account vending, Identity Center (SSO), Service Catalog for managed templates.
EKS clusters with Karpenter autoscaling, Fargate for serverless containers, ECR + image scanning, AppMesh / Istio service mesh.
Lambda + Step Functions, EventBridge, SQS / SNS, Lambda layers for shared code, Lambda PowerTools for observability.
Transit Gateway, PrivateLink, RAM-shared resources, GuardDuty, Security Hub, Inspector, KMS / Secrets Manager hygiene.
Aurora Postgres / MySQL, RDS, DynamoDB, Redshift, Glue + Athena, S3 + Lake Formation. Data-residency and compliance frame.
Cost Explorer + Cost & Usage Reports, savings plans, spot / preemptible workloads, right-sizing, autoscaling tuning. Typical 30–40% Q1 reduction.
Stack depth
Frameworks, libraries, and runtime tools the bench has shipped in production. Not a CV-skim, a working depth.
IaC
Compute
Networking + security
Data + analytics
Observability + ops
Engagement models
We don’t bill hourly contractors. Engagements run against outcomes, choose the shape that matches the work.
See engagement modelsFixed-scope
When the deliverable is clear and the scope is bounded: an MVP, a migration, a discrete platform build. Senior engineering against a written outcome, not against a body count.
Embedded squad
When the work is product-shaped and the cadence is continuous. A senior pod (engineering + design + PM as needed) embedded into your team, with the practice lead co-piloting from HELM.
Managed services
When the system is running and needs ongoing engineering ownership: operations, SLO defense, release management, security and compliance evidence. Monthly retainer against a published SLA.
Selected work
Financial services
Standardized Terraform modules, multi-account Organization with SCP boundaries, shared EKS clusters with multi-tenant namespaces, and SLO dashboards per service. FinOps review cut steady-state spend by 37% in the first quarter.
Duration · 6 months
Brief us
Reply < 4 business hoursFive fields. Goes straight to the practice lead, not an SDR. We’ll reply with a senior engineer’s read on fit, scope, and the engagement model that suits the work.
FAQ
Everything below also appears in the proposal and the SOW: no surprises after signing.
All three are in our active portfolio. AWS for breadth and primary footprint; Azure when Microsoft enterprise integration is the spine; GCP for data + AI workloads or where the customer's existing footprint is there. Multi-cloud only when the workload genuinely demands it. We don’t recommend multi-cloud as a default because the operating tax is real.
ECS / Fargate for steady-state containerized services where Kubernetes complexity isn’t earning its keep. EKS when you need cluster-level multi-tenancy, custom controllers, or Kubernetes-native ecosystem (operators, CRDs, Helm charts). We’ll tell you which fits: Kubernetes is a real operating tax.
Engineering-led delivery. We don't bill hourly contractors against your JIRA board. Every engagement runs against a defined outcome with a senior engineer accountable from kickoff to operating cutover. If you genuinely need staff-aug, discrete bodies, your management, hourly rates, we'll be honest and route you to a partner that fits.
G6 minimum (six-plus years in their craft) on every billable hour. Department leads are G9 or G10. We don't flex juniors onto the bench mid-sprint, we don't subcontract to delivery centers, and we don't dilute senior rates with mixed staffing. The bench in the proposal is the bench in production.
Three engagement models published at /engagement-models/. Fixed-scope for defined deliverables, embedded squads for ongoing product work, managed services for steady-state operations. Rates depend on seniority, engagement length, and region. Discovery + scoping conversation is free; SOWs are written against deliverables, not bodies.
Senior-only across Dallas, Doha, Lahore, and Islamabad. We staff against the engagement's needs (timezone, language, regulatory frame), not against arbitrary regional preferences. Most engagements run with a US/EU-aligned core and a follow-the-sun extended bench when the workload warrants it.
Yes. We name the engineers in the SOW, attach their profiles, and they're on the kickoff. We don't bait-and-switch with senior reviewers and junior execution. If a named engineer needs to roll off the engagement (rare), we surface a replacement from the same seniority tier with explicit handoff.
Talk to a AWS lead
Bring the workload: we’ll bring a senior engineer plus the practice lead most relevant to the work. 30 minutes, no obligation, no junior reps.