Rails 7+ applications
Rails 7.1 / 7.2 with Hotwire (Turbo + Stimulus), import maps, Propshaft, encrypted credentials, Solid Queue / Solid Cache.
Senior engineering · Ruby on Rails
Rails for the workloads it was designed for — content-led web apps, marketplaces, B2B SaaS — with Hotwire, Sidekiq, and the modern Rails 7+ tooling that quietly outperforms what the discourse credits it for.
Why senior, not contractor
Rails 7+ with Hotwire (Turbo + Stimulus) is a quietly excellent stack for the workloads it fits — opinionated MVC for content-led web apps, marketplaces, and B2B SaaS where engineering velocity is the value. Prosigns ships Rails for greenfield product-engineering work where the team can absorb Ruby, and for legacy Rails modernization (Rails 4/5 → 7+, Sprockets → Propshaft, jQuery → Stimulus) where the existing app is too valuable to rewrite.
Senior floor
G6+ minimum
Bench depth
12+ G6/G9 engineers
In production
2018+
Engagement
Outcome-led SOW
Where Ruby on Rails ships
Specific applications of Ruby on Rails we’ve built and operate. Every example below maps to a real engagement, not a bullet on a stack-card.
Rails 7.1 / 7.2 with Hotwire (Turbo + Stimulus), import maps, Propshaft, encrypted credentials, Solid Queue / Solid Cache.
Turbo Frames + Streams for SPA-feel without the SPA cost. Stimulus for incremental interactivity. View Components for reusable UI.
Rails as JSON API for separate frontend (React / Vue / mobile) consumers. GraphQL via graphql-ruby where the consumer benefits.
Sidekiq Pro / Solid Queue for durable workers, scheduled jobs, retry semantics with DLQ wiring. Cron-replacement done properly.
Packwerk for enforced module boundaries within the monolith. Engines for true separation. The opposite of micro-services-on-day-one.
Rails 4 / 5 / 6 → 7+, Sprockets → Propshaft, CoffeeScript → Stimulus, ActionCable → Turbo Streams. Phased upgrade with reconciliation.
Stack depth
Frameworks, libraries, and runtime tools the bench has shipped in production. Not a CV-skim — a working depth.
Core
Background + cache
Data
API + frontend
Quality + ops
Engagement models
We don’t bill hourly contractors. Engagements run against outcomes — choose the shape that matches the work.
See engagement modelsFixed-scope
When the deliverable is clear and the scope is bounded — an MVP, a migration, a discrete platform build. Senior engineering against a written outcome, not against a body count.
Embedded squad
When the work is product-shaped and the cadence is continuous. A senior pod (engineering + design + PM as needed) embedded into your team, with the practice lead co-piloting from HELM.
Managed services
When the system is running and needs ongoing engineering ownership — operations, SLO defense, release management, security and compliance evidence. Monthly retainer against a published SLA.
Selected work
Marketplaces
Migrated a 2017-era Rails 4 monolith to Rails 7.1 with Hotwire and import maps. Replaced the SPA frontend with Turbo Frames where the SPA wasn’t earning its keep. Sidekiq → Solid Queue for the worker tier.
Duration · 5 months
Brief us
Reply < 4 business hoursFive fields. Goes straight to the practice lead — not an SDR. We’ll reply with a senior engineer’s read on fit, scope, and the engagement model that suits the work.
FAQ
Everything below also appears in the proposal and the SOW — no surprises after signing.
Rails fits for content-led web apps, marketplaces, B2B SaaS, internal tools — workloads where engineering velocity and convention-over-configuration are the value. It doesn't fit for high-throughput async / event-driven systems, for apps where every team writes Ruby reluctantly, or for greenfield where TypeScript end-to-end is the team's existing strength. We’ll tell you which.
Hotwire when the app is server-rendered and SPA-grade interactivity is selective. Separate React/Vue when the frontend has SPA-level complexity that Turbo can’t reach economically, or when the API is consumed by mobile / multiple frontends. Both are credible and we ship both.
Engineering-led delivery. We don't bill hourly contractors against your JIRA board. Every engagement runs against a defined outcome with a senior engineer accountable from kickoff to operating cutover. If you genuinely need staff-aug — discrete bodies, your management, hourly rates — we'll be honest and route you to a partner that fits.
G6 minimum (six-plus years in their craft) on every billable hour. Department leads are G9 or G10. We don't flex juniors onto the bench mid-sprint, we don't subcontract to delivery centers, and we don't dilute senior rates with mixed staffing. The bench in the proposal is the bench in production.
Three engagement models published at /engagement-models/. Fixed-scope for defined deliverables, embedded squads for ongoing product work, managed services for steady-state operations. Rates depend on seniority, engagement length, and region. Discovery + scoping conversation is free; SOWs are written against deliverables, not bodies.
Senior-only across Dallas, Doha, Lahore, and Islamabad. We staff against the engagement's needs (timezone, language, regulatory frame), not against arbitrary regional preferences. Most engagements run with a US/EU-aligned core and a follow-the-sun extended bench when the workload warrants it.
Yes. We name the engineers in the SOW, attach their profiles, and they're on the kickoff. We don't bait-and-switch with senior reviewers and junior execution. If a named engineer needs to roll off the engagement (rare), we surface a replacement from the same seniority tier with explicit handoff.
Talk to a Ruby on Rails lead
Bring the workload — we’ll bring a senior engineer plus the practice lead most relevant to the work. 30 minutes, no obligation, no junior reps.