−28%
unplanned downtime
Predictive maintenance
Time-series ML on sensor data with explicit failure-mode modeling, integration with the maintenance management system, and the operational discipline plant maintenance teams actually use.
AI & Machine Learning × Manufacturing
Predictive maintenance, computer-vision quality control, production scheduling, and demand forecasting — engineered for OT/IT convergence with the operational embedding plant floors actually require.
The reality
Industrial AI projects share a recurring failure mode: a model that worked in lab conditions degrades on the floor; an integration with the maintenance management system that was scoped as 'phase 2'; a predictive-maintenance alert that surfaces in a system the technician doesn't open; a quality-control vision deployment that requires a data scientist on call; and a digital-twin program that produced visualizations but never closed the loop with operations. The model isn't the problem; the operational embedding is.
Prosigns ships industrial AI with the operational embedding as primary scope. Senior engineers embedded with maintenance teams during model design, plant-floor data understood as primary scope rather than as an obstacle, integration with MES / EAM / SCADA designed first, and the operating discipline plant rhythms require. CORTEX builds the AI; FORGE handles MES integration; CITADEL handles ISA/IEC 62443 and GxP where applicable.
Where it ships
Concrete applications where ai & machine learning unlocks measurable value inside manufacturing delivery constraints.
−28%
unplanned downtime
Time-series ML on sensor data with explicit failure-mode modeling, integration with the maintenance management system, and the operational discipline plant maintenance teams actually use.
98.7%
defect detection rate
Defect detection, dimensional inspection, and process verification — edge inference where latency demands it, integrated with reject-handling and traceability systems.
Optimization for throughput, changeover minimization, energy efficiency, and constraint satisfaction. Integration with MES and ERP for closed-loop scheduling.
Multi-horizon demand forecasting for finished goods, raw materials, and capacity. Integration with S&OP processes and the ERP that drives execution.
Real-time energy optimization across manufacturing operations, with sustainability reporting integrated into the same data substrate analytics workloads use.
Computer vision for PPE compliance, near-miss detection, and ergonomic risk monitoring — engineered against worker-privacy frame and the unionization realities plants actually face.
How we engage
Each phase has a deliverable, an owner, and an acceptance criterion calibrated to manufacturing delivery.
Discovery on the plant floor. We walk lines, talk to operators and maintenance, audit OT inventory, and identify the integration surfaces that matter. AI use cases land against actual plant realities, not generic Industry 4.0 frameworks.
Cloud-first AI layer with explicit OT integration boundaries. Network segmentation respecting ISA/IEC 62443 zones, edge inference where latency / sovereignty demands it, and identity that bridges OT and IT identities.
Senior engineers embedded with plant operations and maintenance during model design. We don't build models plant teams won't use — we build alongside the people who'll operate them, with explicit integration into the workflows they already run.
Plant-rhythm-aware operating cadence: quarterly model retraining, monthly maintenance-workflow integration health, and the IR plan that handles plant-floor incidents — not just data center ones.
Capabilities
Stack
Compliance overlay
Every manufacturing engagement carries the evidence collection that procurement and audit teams expect on day one.
Network zones and conduits documented in the architecture, identity model that respects OT/IT boundaries, change management that doesn't blow up plant safety, and audit logging integrated with existing OT security posture.
For pharma and medical-device manufacturing: electronic records, electronic signatures, validation evidence aligned to GAMP 5, and the audit-trail tooling regulated manufacturing requires. We co-pilot with the customer's regulatory and quality functions.
Validation lifecycle, IQ / OQ / PQ documentation, change management aligned to GxP, and the data-integrity discipline (ALCOA+) regulated manufacturing operates under.
Worker-facing AI (PPE compliance, ergonomic monitoring, productivity analytics) engineered against worker-privacy frames, union agreements, and the explicit consent / opt-out patterns labor relations require.
Selected work
Where this fits
Common questions
Yes — when latency, sovereignty, or connectivity demands it. NVIDIA Jetson, AWS Wavelength, Azure Stack Edge, and on-prem GPU deployments are all in our portfolio. We tell you when 'edge' is the wrong answer and the right one is cloud with QoS-aware connectivity.
As primary scope, not phase 2. Major CMMS / EAM platforms (SAP PM, Maximo, Infor EAM, Fiix, eMaint) are in our active engagement portfolio. We design integrations through documented interface contracts, with explicit handling of work-order lifecycle and the technician workflow patterns the system actually supports.
Yes — Rockwell, Siemens, Honeywell, GE Digital, AVEVA, and the major MES vendors through their published interfaces. Where the integration surface is custom, we build sanctioned interfaces with the OT team rather than working around them.
21 CFR Part 11 and GxP frame is part of the discipline — electronic records, electronic signatures, validation evidence aligned to GAMP 5, IQ / OQ / PQ documentation, and the audit-trail tooling regulated manufacturing requires. We co-pilot with the customer's regulatory and quality functions.
Engineered against worker-privacy frame from architecture. Computer-vision PPE compliance, ergonomic monitoring, and near-miss detection deployed with explicit worker-consent and union-agreement patterns. We tell you when an AI use case is fundamentally bias-fragile or labor-relations-sensitive.
Discovery: 4–6 weeks, $60K–$150K. Predictive maintenance program (1–3 plants): 6–10 months, $400K–$1.2M. Computer-vision QC across multiple lines: 5–9 months, $400K–$1M. Production scheduling AI: 6–12 months, $500K–$1.5M. Multi-plant programs: $1.5M–$5M+. Managed Services: $40K–$200K monthly retainer.
Talk to us
A senior engineer plus the CORTEX department lead joins the first call — both with prior manufacturing delivery experience.