SwiftUI + UIKit hybrid apps
SwiftUI-first for new screens, UIKit interop for legacy or platform-specific surfaces. NavigationStack discipline, observation-based state.
Senior engineering · iOS / Swift
Native iOS engineering — Swift, SwiftUI, Combine, Core Data, App Store review hardening, and the privacy-manifest discipline App Tracking Transparency now demands.
Why senior, not contractor
Building an iOS app is the easy part. Surviving App Store review is the hard part — and so is hitting WidgetKit / Live Activities / App Intents discoverability budgets, defending battery and memory budgets across iPhone 11 → 16 Pro Max, and shipping enterprise builds via MDM that don't break on the next iOS release. Prosigns ships iOS as production engineering: privacy manifests reviewed against runtime behavior, performance budgets defended in CI, and a release pipeline that the App Store accepts on the first attempt.
Senior floor
G6+ minimum
Bench depth
15+ G6/G9 engineers
In production
2018+
Engagement
Outcome-led SOW
Where iOS / Swift ships
Specific applications of iOS / Swift we’ve built and operate. Every example below maps to a real engagement, not a bullet on a stack-card.
SwiftUI-first for new screens, UIKit interop for legacy or platform-specific surfaces. NavigationStack discipline, observation-based state.
Structured concurrency, actors, MainActor discipline, Sendable conformance, isolation-aware error handling.
Privacy manifests, App Tracking Transparency, App Privacy Report alignment, common rejection-category audit pre-submission.
Apple Business Manager, MDM (Intune, JAMF, Workspace ONE), custom apps program, configuration profiles, MAM policies.
HealthKit integration, accessibility-first UI (Voiceover, Dynamic Type, Reduce Motion), regulated workflows for clinician apps.
watchOS apps with proper complications and Live Activities, tvOS for media-led brands, CarPlay extensions where appropriate.
Stack depth
Frameworks, libraries, and runtime tools the bench has shipped in production. Not a CV-skim — a working depth.
UI frameworks
Data + persistence
System integrations
Networking
Quality + ops
Engagement models
We don’t bill hourly contractors. Engagements run against outcomes — choose the shape that matches the work.
See engagement modelsFixed-scope
When the deliverable is clear and the scope is bounded — an MVP, a migration, a discrete platform build. Senior engineering against a written outcome, not against a body count.
Embedded squad
When the work is product-shaped and the cadence is continuous. A senior pod (engineering + design + PM as needed) embedded into your team, with the practice lead co-piloting from HELM.
Managed services
When the system is running and needs ongoing engineering ownership — operations, SLO defense, release management, security and compliance evidence. Monthly retainer against a published SLA.
Selected work
Healthcare
SwiftUI-first with UIKit interop for legacy hospital integrations. HealthKit + custom CDA integrations. Survived MDM rollout and the first 60-day audit cycle.
Duration · 9 months
Brief us
Reply < 4 business hoursFive fields. Goes straight to the practice lead — not an SDR. We’ll reply with a senior engineer’s read on fit, scope, and the engagement model that suits the work.
FAQ
Everything below also appears in the proposal and the SOW — no surprises after signing.
SwiftUI for new builds — the productivity win is real and it's the framework Apple is investing in. UIKit interop where SwiftUI doesn't yet match parity (deep custom transitions, complex collection views, certain accessibility surfaces). We don't ship UIKit-only new builds in 2026.
Yes. Privacy manifests, ATT compliance, and common rejection categories are reviewed pre-submission. Resubmission support is included if the first attempt is rejected — but our first-attempt acceptance rate is in the high 90%s.
Engineering-led delivery. We don't bill hourly contractors against your JIRA board. Every engagement runs against a defined outcome with a senior engineer accountable from kickoff to operating cutover. If you genuinely need staff-aug — discrete bodies, your management, hourly rates — we'll be honest and route you to a partner that fits.
G6 minimum (six-plus years in their craft) on every billable hour. Department leads are G9 or G10. We don't flex juniors onto the bench mid-sprint, we don't subcontract to delivery centers, and we don't dilute senior rates with mixed staffing. The bench in the proposal is the bench in production.
Three engagement models published at /engagement-models/. Fixed-scope for defined deliverables, embedded squads for ongoing product work, managed services for steady-state operations. Rates depend on seniority, engagement length, and region. Discovery + scoping conversation is free; SOWs are written against deliverables, not bodies.
Senior-only across Dallas, Doha, Lahore, and Islamabad. We staff against the engagement's needs (timezone, language, regulatory frame), not against arbitrary regional preferences. Most engagements run with a US/EU-aligned core and a follow-the-sun extended bench when the workload warrants it.
Yes. We name the engineers in the SOW, attach their profiles, and they're on the kickoff. We don't bait-and-switch with senior reviewers and junior execution. If a named engineer needs to roll off the engagement (rare), we surface a replacement from the same seniority tier with explicit handoff.
Talk to a iOS / Swift lead
Bring the workload — we’ll bring a senior engineer plus the practice lead most relevant to the work. 30 minutes, no obligation, no junior reps.