Model registry + versioning
MLflow, Weights & Biases, Vertex Model Registry, SageMaker Model Registry. Promotion gates, audit trails, lineage from training run to production.
Senior engineering · MLOps
MLOps as production engineering — model registries, eval harnesses, drift monitoring, A/B testing, and the operational substrate that distinguishes shipped ML from notebook demos.
Why senior, not contractor
Most ML in production today doesn’t have a registry, doesn’t have evals in CI, doesn’t monitor drift, and ships new models the same way it shipped the first one — by re-running a notebook. The MLOps gap is where ML engagements quietly fail six months after launch. Prosigns ships MLOps as production substrate: registries with audit trails, eval harnesses gating every model change in CI, drift monitoring with alerting, A/B testing infrastructure, and rollback semantics that survive a vendor model changing its behavior overnight.
Senior floor
G6+ minimum
Bench depth
15+ G6/G9 engineers
In production
2019+
Engagement
Outcome-led SOW
Where MLOps ships
Specific applications of MLOps we’ve built and operate. Every example below maps to a real engagement, not a bullet on a stack-card.
MLflow, Weights & Biases, Vertex Model Registry, SageMaker Model Registry. Promotion gates, audit trails, lineage from training run to production.
Per-use-case eval suites — RAG faithfulness, agent task success, classification calibration. Gating model + prompt changes before deploy.
Evidently, WhyLabs, Arize, Fiddler. Distribution drift, prediction drift, performance drift. Alerting wired into incident response.
Ray Serve, Triton, BentoML, vLLM, KServe. Autoscaling, fallback behaviors, cost-aware routing across models / providers.
Feast, Tecton, Hopsworks. Online + offline features with consistency, lineage, and time-travel for training reproducibility.
Statsig, GrowthBook, LaunchDarkly + custom. Model A/B tests, prompt A/B tests, multi-armed bandits where they fit.
Stack depth
Frameworks, libraries, and runtime tools the bench has shipped in production. Not a CV-skim — a working depth.
Registries + tracking
Inference
Monitoring
Feature stores
Orchestration + experimentation
Engagement models
We don’t bill hourly contractors. Engagements run against outcomes — choose the shape that matches the work.
See engagement modelsFixed-scope
When the deliverable is clear and the scope is bounded — an MVP, a migration, a discrete platform build. Senior engineering against a written outcome, not against a body count.
Embedded squad
When the work is product-shaped and the cadence is continuous. A senior pod (engineering + design + PM as needed) embedded into your team, with the practice lead co-piloting from HELM.
Managed services
When the system is running and needs ongoing engineering ownership — operations, SLO defense, release management, security and compliance evidence. Monthly retainer against a published SLA.
Selected work
Financial services
MLflow registry with promotion gates, Evidently drift monitoring with PagerDuty alerting, BentoML inference with autoscaling, eval harnesses in GitHub Actions. Cleared the first model-risk-management audit on the new substrate.
Duration · 4 months
Brief us
Reply < 4 business hoursFive fields. Goes straight to the practice lead — not an SDR. We’ll reply with a senior engineer’s read on fit, scope, and the engagement model that suits the work.
FAQ
Everything below also appears in the proposal and the SOW — no surprises after signing.
Not always. For batch-predict use cases or single-team ML, a feature store often adds complexity that doesn't pay for itself. For multi-team ML with online inference and shared features across models, a feature store is genuinely the right tool. We’ll tell you which fits — we don’t recommend feature stores by default.
LangFuse / LangSmith / Phoenix for trace collection across the full agent or RAG pipeline. Per-use-case quality dashboards (faithfulness, latency, token cost). Eval harnesses in CI gating prompt + model changes. The same operational discipline as classical ML — adapted for the LLM-specific failure modes.
Engineering-led delivery. We don't bill hourly contractors against your JIRA board. Every engagement runs against a defined outcome with a senior engineer accountable from kickoff to operating cutover. If you genuinely need staff-aug — discrete bodies, your management, hourly rates — we'll be honest and route you to a partner that fits.
G6 minimum (six-plus years in their craft) on every billable hour. Department leads are G9 or G10. We don't flex juniors onto the bench mid-sprint, we don't subcontract to delivery centers, and we don't dilute senior rates with mixed staffing. The bench in the proposal is the bench in production.
Three engagement models published at /engagement-models/. Fixed-scope for defined deliverables, embedded squads for ongoing product work, managed services for steady-state operations. Rates depend on seniority, engagement length, and region. Discovery + scoping conversation is free; SOWs are written against deliverables, not bodies.
Senior-only across Dallas, Doha, Lahore, and Islamabad. We staff against the engagement's needs (timezone, language, regulatory frame), not against arbitrary regional preferences. Most engagements run with a US/EU-aligned core and a follow-the-sun extended bench when the workload warrants it.
Yes. We name the engineers in the SOW, attach their profiles, and they're on the kickoff. We don't bait-and-switch with senior reviewers and junior execution. If a named engineer needs to roll off the engagement (rare), we surface a replacement from the same seniority tier with explicit handoff.
Talk to a MLOps lead
Bring the workload — we’ll bring a senior engineer plus the practice lead most relevant to the work. 30 minutes, no obligation, no junior reps.